READ THE SYNOPSIS BELOW
“This study would represent a significant step forward in understanding ancient civilizations and their culture, demonstrating how the use of proto-Sumerian ideographic language could be fundamental to deciphering the symbols and messages left by past populations.” (Translated from Italian)
Yes.
It is in fact an ideographic language, made up of figures and signs. It corresponds exactly to the oldest known ideographic language, deciphered in the mid-20th century: Proto-Sumerian.
Absolutely.
Their mythology, their great divinities, their belief in an afterlife and the rebirth of the dead.
Because these were their temples, their sanctuaries, where they would go to invoke the power of the mother goddess to give the dead a new birth, just as she had done, according to them, for the father of the gods.
Archaeology itself, faced with the evidence, has had to relegate to oblivion the old image of primitive hunters depicting everyday hunting scenes. Today, the symbolic and sacred dimension is widely accepted even if, until now and this book, it was misunderstood.
Neither more nor less than man, the primordial father, the first of the living, but also the greatest of the defied spirits after his death.
The world of archaeology, which has no expertise in linguistics, has because of this, as I demonstrate in this book, missed this discovery.
For centuries, under the influence of its central scientific dogma that our ancestors were “primitive,” it observed these frescoes with a superficial, first-degree gaze, projecting its own childish interpretations onto them. Today, for the first time, we can read them… and what they tell us overturns everything we thought we knew.
In archaic ideographic language, these animal figures are used to compose either the proper name of the father of the gods Adam (this is the case, for example, of the bull or the aurochs), or that of his title Kish (or Kisha, Kissa, Kiza) which serves to designate him as the primordial ancestor, the procreating founder of the world of men. These are ideograms synonymous with his name.
As for the mother goddess, she was represented by the unicorn (but also the cow, the mare, the doe and…). This unicorn, which is the central symbolic element of the seals of the Proto-Indian Harappan script (still undeciphered), is the same as the pregnant one found at the entrance of Lascaux, on the first panel that bears her name…
What was taken for simple drawings by primitive men actually reveals a sophisticated language directly linked to the foundations of our civilization.
Yes. Kish and Giza were named after his title, pronounced simply differently due to archaic linguistic betacisms, in order to pay him homage.
Exactly.
Yes. Even if, fundamentally, I am of Christian faith, here I am only reading an ideographic script. It’s basic. As for the account of Genesis, it is the legacy of much older prior books and has also passed through the ages.
Regarding the teaching of the cave paintings, I am not engaging in any chapel proselytism, because with them we are faced with a different version, another interpretation of the events of the biblical Genesis, and my duty as a researcher is to report on it, even if I do not endorse it. We will see, as I will demonstrate in my following books, that this version has so marked humanity that its mnemonic trace has been engraved not only in prehistoric and ancient mythology, but also in the very etymology of the Sumerian and Egyptian hieroglyphic languages. Which is logical, because my research also shows that the mythology and etymology of these languages are two sides of the same coin. A coin… of theater, the one where our history was played out, the history of our origins, as it has been transmitted to us.
They are colossal, whatever your beliefs. Located at the crossroads of the history of religion and science, it deciphers the basis, the very elementary foundation of the history of humanity, of what constituted the original common trunk of all its future beliefs and religions.
Is there anything more important? I don’t think so.
I understand your skepticism. But have you read the evidence provided? Will you be among those who prejudge without reading or knowing, those who will remain in ignorance, or will you dare to open your eyes to this multi-millennial truth?
That has often been said of men of science who saw beyond appearances…
👉 536 pages. 278 of demonstration. 10 examples of deciphering cave paintings (Lascaux, Marsoulas*, Pindal Caves). An irrefutable conclusion.
So please, be silent for a moment. Just, read.
See the facts for yourselves.
And say goodbye to everything you thought you knew, to all your prejudices…
Because you are about to witness the greatest revelation in the history of humanity**.
*Join the community of enthusiasts of this series on Facebook
Discover one or two exclusive excerpts!!
THE DECIPHERMENT OF THE FIRST AUROCHS ON THE UNICORN PANEL OF LASCAUX (FRANCE)
THE DECIPHERMENT OF THE SECOND PETTIFORM SIGN OF THE MARSOULAS CAVE (SPAIN)
Read the excerpt
For more exclusive excerpts, subscribe to my newsletter
(You can scan this code with your banking app or camera)
Important: To receive your digital book, please ensure you provide a valid email address during the payment process.
Your book will be sent to it within 24 hours following confirmation of your payment.
Thanks for sharing. Impressive work, whatever the "scientific establishment" may think. It takes courage (and conviction) to turn the tables. Bravo for this incredible work.
A blend of intimate conviction that gives impetus and direction to the research, and scientific rigor that triangulates years of deciphering our languages, this book opens up new perspectives, and so much the better. Without answering the existential questions of our origins, it proposes a red thread for the development of ways of transmitting the knowledge (ça voir) of humanity to subsequent generations.
!!! After a twelve-hour flight, an eight-hour train journey and a few evenings out: bravo!
What a body of work, what erudition, what a singular and seductive point of view!
Congratulations
Hello, Yvar.
I've come to the end of this second part, which is as ambitious and impressive as ever, thanks to the immense amount of research and synthesis that has gone into it.
I don't know where to start, as the subject is so vast, so I'll do my best to answer the question...
Did you convince me?
Not really, since I was already convinced that most beliefs, including archaic ones, were born out of the same myths, which aimed to better apprehend death, explain natural phenomena that had long eluded comprehension, appease the wrath of the god or gods who were supposed to provoke them, create a hierarchy, instrumentalize power, awaken awareness of good and evil... Which is to say, I'm convinced that today's religions, with the exception of Buddhism (a non-theistic religion, of course ;-)), have their origins in this initial myth of the God as judge and creator.
But yes, you've convinced me by focusing on the symbolic rather than literal meaning of ideographic languages with multiple meanings, by pointing out their similarities from one site to another, from one civilization to another, by minimizing the impact of coincidences through the improbability of their number, because in so doing you've reduced the margin of error. Could the effect be the same if we only speculate on the literal meaning? I don't know. In other words, it's best to ignore your inner Cartesian to be totally convinced ;-).
However, by reducing the margins of interpretation, the demonstration by symbolic similarities becomes rational, ... In any case, if my eyes and my few words as a neophyte encourage you, I'm delighted. Thank you for this talented sharing, Yvar. May my candid intervention motivate readers to tackle your work!
Copyright © IKONU 2023.